Introduction
For a quarter of a century, millions of people with HIV infection and AIDS, especially in the developing world, have received highly toxic chemicals deceptively named anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs. They have been told that these toxic drugs fight the human immunodeficiency virus in their bodies – but not told that they also attack all other cells in the body and destroy the immune system.
For 25 years the pharmaceutical cartel has operated one of the most malicious marketing schemes in the history of mankind: promoting toxic drugs that damage the immune system to millions of patients already suffering from acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The results have been predictable: a growing wave of drug-induced immune deficiencies in genocidal proportions.
Amazingly, even though the manufacturers of these “chemical warfare agents” i.e. ARVs, are required by law to include in every product leaflet the scientific fact that these drugs can neither cure HIV nor AIDS, for decades no one dared to challenge this fraud.
All that changed in 2008. In a historic case at the High Court in London, the British newspaper The Guardian was sued for maintaining the fraudulent claims that ARV drugs are life saving and life prolonging. Dr. Matthias Rath, who initiated this litigation, together with his colleagues, gave the newspaper and its team of ARV promoting experts the opportunity to defend their false claims under oath. They could not. The details of this historic litigation are documented here.
Population control – then and now
The year 2008 marks a watershed for the multi-billion dollar ARV business: it has been exposed as a hoax in sworn court testimonies. By publishing this historic exchange of scientific arguments conducted under oath – and details of the capitulation of the ARV promoters in the face of the scientific facts – insurance companies, governments and above all millions of patients now have a legal base from which to hold responsible the drug companies involved in such unscrupulous and criminal behavior.
In publishing this information, it was clear that the “moles” of the ARV drug business, hidden away in institutions and publishing houses around the world, would have to come out and fight against the exposure of the ARV fraud. By doing so they would, in fact, accelerate the growing global awareness of this fraud – a necessary condition to terminate it – rather than keep it hidden as they intended.
The first reaction to the exposure of this fraud came from the heartland of the ARV drug business, South Africa. The Cape Times, a newspaper in the hands of an international media consortium, launched a broadside attack on former president Thabo Mbeki. The implied allegation: president Mbeki, an outspoken critic of the ARV drug business, was allegedly responsible for the death of people in South Africa who did not get access to the toxic ARV drugs. In a complete reversal of the scientific facts, the man who saved hundreds of thousands of lives in South Africa by cautioning against the use of these deadly chemicals, was essentially accused of killing people.
The attack in the Cape Times was based on a publication issued by employees of Harvard University in the USA. Using the name of this academic institution, the newspaper apparently tried to overturn the scientific facts. A closer look at this academic institution removes all mysteries about this publication. David Rockefeller, the chairman of the world’s largest investment consortium with controlling interests in the pharmaceutical drug business, had, only months before made a record donation of $100 million to Harvard. For a detailed critical review of this “contractual work” click here.
In other words, the drug cartel is using academic institutions, perceived to be independent and reputable, to influence global public opinion in favor of its multi-trillion dollar drug investment business.
But there is an even more burning question: what is the motive of anyone promoting toxic chemicals known to severely harm and eventually to kill millions of people, especially in the developing world? The staggering answer to this question is documented in an official National Security Study Memorandum of the US government. This document entitled NSSM 200 was authored by Henry Kissinger at a time when he was both Secretary of State and National security Advisor. It defined long-term population control in the developing world as an issue of the highest priority for the future maintenance of the national security of the United States – and the investment interests that controlled its government for nearly a century.
The global promotion of toxic ARVs to millions of people is nothing other than the unscrupulous execution of this plan – behind the mask of it being a humanitarian action. Seventy years ago, when the oil and drug cartel made its last efforts at global conquest, the world had to wait until the end of the catastrophe of WWII before the corporate culprits were put on trial.
Not this time!
The genocidal proportions of the ARV business with the AIDS epidemic – immediately understandable by anyone – compels a much deeper analysis of the nature of the pharmaceutical investment business with disease. Most importantly, this fraudulent business model needs to be terminated as soon as possible in the interests of the health and lives of six billion people living today and all future generations.
